| 1 |
Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Anyway, that's my plan -- I've a few lists of TODOs for stuff, |
| 3 |
> especially for the networkless docs, that will be fairly intensive. Now, |
| 4 |
> from the translators point of view, what do you and don't you want to |
| 5 |
> see me do to the docs in draft/? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'd start with copying current 2006.1 stuff into draft (be sure to |
| 8 |
include CVS revision in the commit message as we don't use better SCM |
| 9 |
that would keep track of that), then applying any changes that are |
| 10 |
required without any revbumps *and* without mixing content and |
| 11 |
formatting changes. Each commit should either touch the real content |
| 12 |
(and nothing else) or just change formatting, fix typos etc. It's a real |
| 13 |
PITA to go through a diff for a paragraph just to see someone fixed |
| 14 |
spelling in one word or (even worse) just re-wrapped text. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As an alternative, point me to a working diff implementation that |
| 17 |
ignores XML formatting and just shows the real changes :). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
<insert usual warning about yoswink's knife here /> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers, |
| 22 |
-jkt |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives