| 1 |
Xavier Neys пишет: |
| 2 |
> Notes: |
| 3 |
> 0) All languages must have a metadoc.xml. Not a problem IMO. <metadoc/> will do |
| 4 |
> for currently unsupported languages. |
| 5 |
> 1) We have to use metadoc and *may not* test the corresponding file (ie. |
| 6 |
> s:/pl/:/en/:) as that would force us to keep files we want to remove in /doc/en/ |
| 7 |
> until all translated versions have disappeared. |
| 8 |
> 2) We need to use the dates and not the versions because using the versions |
| 9 |
> would force us to compare handbooks file by file. |
| 10 |
> 3) Reminder: the date of a handbook is the max_date(master, all parts) |
| 11 |
> 4) Some of you need to stop bumping dates needlessly |
| 12 |
> 5) link attributes must contain the full path, no more <book |
| 13 |
> link="handbook-x86.xml"> (not required on my test site, but would be on www.g.o) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> At the moment, it is limited to /doc as dates are not reliable outside of /doc |
| 16 |
> anyway (not yyyy-mm-dd formatted or not bumped properly). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Samples: |
| 19 |
> http://gentoo.neysx.org/doc/fr/handbook/2005.1/ |
| 20 |
> http://gentoo.neysx.org/doc/pl/nvidia-guide.xml |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> FYI, an inserts would like like |
| 23 |
> http://gentoo.neysx.org/doc/en/inserts-en.xml?passthru=1 |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Please comment. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
As for me, it's good that we only give a hint -- it's up to our user to |
| 28 |
decide if the doc is really obsolete. |
| 29 |
Great solution Xavier! |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
WKR, |
| 32 |
Alexey Chumakov |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |
Archives