| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:33:03PM -0800, Jack Dark wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think the reason why that license is the only one allowed in |
| 3 |
> GuideXML is because that's the _only_ license that may be used by |
| 4 |
> official Gentoo documentation. AFAIK, there's simply no other choice |
| 5 |
> for publishing official docs under any other sort of license. |
| 6 |
> Consistency is good; imagine all the problems that might crop up as a |
| 7 |
> result of various docs having different licenses, or even conflicting |
| 8 |
> licenses. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
i'm not asking for a license which would cause any conflict at all |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
public-domain is compatible with EVERYTHING |
| 13 |
-mike |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |
Archives