| 1 |
> Seriously, separate wikis, one for the the |
| 2 |
> approve 'inner circle' and a separate wiki for us commoners, |
| 3 |
> would be keen and result in an explosion of useful |
| 4 |
> information. After all, isn't this what we have, except the |
| 5 |
> inner (doc) circle has no influence over the unofficial wiki? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> After some time, the inner circle could find a way to |
| 8 |
> publish(convert) from either wiki to the form desired by the |
| 9 |
> inner circle (handbook?)....? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Or why not simply have a way for the "official" docs team to mark a wiki |
| 12 |
entry "approved" at a specific point in time? Wikiers could then continue |
| 13 |
to edit it. A marker at the top could say "Reviewed on 2010-11-06 by |
| 14 |
whomever@g.o" and "edited 5 times since review:" with a hyperlink |
| 15 |
to show a graphical diff between the current version and the approved |
| 16 |
version. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-Mike |
Archives