| 1 |
On Thursday 15 September 2005 04:28 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some |
| 3 |
> point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of |
| 4 |
> course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo |
| 5 |
> tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of |
| 6 |
> course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been |
| 7 |
> considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be |
| 8 |
> feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
although moving around in cvs is a pita, i dont see it being all that common |
| 11 |
in the xml subdir ... many of the other benefits that svn has over cvs |
| 12 |
(branching and changesets) just isnt that useful in terms of website |
| 13 |
management imo ... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
also, although i cant comment on this directly, i imagine that all the |
| 16 |
infrastructure we have in place (automated QA checks, cvs->website nodes, |
| 17 |
etc...) would be a pain to change over too ... |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |
Archives