| 1 |
On 9/3/08, wireless <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> It should not be that hard (internally) to track the last date |
| 3 |
> the file was touched using 'touch' or whatever mechanism floats |
| 4 |
> your boat, to provide the average user some comfort as to the |
| 5 |
> usability, related to the age of the last check for accuracy the |
| 6 |
> doc has undergone. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Tracking whatever we want to track is not a problem. The question is |
| 9 |
do we want to track a revision date? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
And touch isn't the right way to do it :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> On another note, I think what is needed is something simple and bold |
| 14 |
> at the top of the official gentoo docs that clearly let folks know that the |
| 15 |
> doc is an official gentoo maintained doc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In fact, if I understand correctly the terms of use of the Gentoo name |
| 18 |
and logo (http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/name-logo.xml), such sites (if |
| 19 |
not illegal by using gentoo in their domainname) HAVE to state |
| 20 |
explicitly that they're not official Gentoo. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Camille Huot |
Archives