| 1 |
I suggested the change because i pronounce it as a word itself, Fak (never |
| 2 |
heard it pronounced diferent, but here isn't too much people speaking |
| 3 |
english ><). Sorry, i'm not a native english speaker, as you can see :P |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Shyam Mani wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Curtis Napier wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>>Yes indeed, ciaran is correct. You go by the "sound" not by the |
| 10 |
>>>spelling. That's why we say "an honor" instead of "a honor" (the h is |
| 11 |
>>>silent). But in the case of FAQ he is incorrect because it's pronounced |
| 12 |
>>>fa-ack not ef-ack. Silly en_GB speakers. :-) |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Ummm, we pronounce it af eff a que. Not Fak. It is an acronym and eff a |
| 16 |
>> que is how you say it :) So, he's right and it is an FAQ. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>>>http://www.drgrammar.org/faqs/#36 |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> And from the above site... |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> According to The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style, "The |
| 25 |
>> indefinite article a is used before words beginning with a consonant |
| 26 |
>> sound, including /y/ and /w/ sounds. The other form, an, is used before |
| 27 |
>> words beginning with a vowel sound. Hence, a European country, a Ouija |
| 28 |
>> board, a uniform, an FBI agent... |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> We say Eff Bee Eye agent, not Fubby agent or EffBee or EffBye, right? So |
| 31 |
>> it's Eff A Que :) not fack or you know where I'm going :p |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> No, when you use the first letters of a series of words that is going to |
| 35 |
> be pronounced as a series of letters like F.B.I then that is an |
| 36 |
> abbreviation or an initialism. An acronym is the first letters of a |
| 37 |
> series of words put together to form a new word. FAQ is an acronym not |
| 38 |
> an abbreviation so it is pronounced as a word not as the letters F.A.Q.. |
| 39 |
> If it was supposed to be pronounced as a series of letters it would be |
| 40 |
> written F.A.Q. but it isn't. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9354382?query=acronym&ct= |
| 43 |
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=acronym&x=0&y=0 |
| 44 |
> http://www.answers.com/topic/acronym |
| 45 |
> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/acronym |
| 46 |
> http://www.answers.com/acronym&r=67 |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> This is silly. Just leave it up to the person who writes the doc. What |
| 49 |
> difference does it make to any of us? Rane already changed it and |
| 50 |
> changing it back would be redundant. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-- |
| 54 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |
Archives