| 1 |
> . . . no. There's zero point in doing all the work twice (original |
| 2 |
> article and then XMLifying it.) Especially since now you have twice the |
| 3 |
> maintenance burden, and it IS harder to maintain XML docs than wiki |
| 4 |
> articles. |
| 5 |
I've never gave it a thought, but it looks logical. That being said, |
| 6 |
is GDP ever going to switch to wiki, if wiki prooves it self as good |
| 7 |
enough? Anyone can se few (dis)advantages of this, of course, but is |
| 8 |
it even considered as an option? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-- |
| 11 |
FreeB(eer)S(ex)D(rugs) are the real daemons |
Archives