Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Xavier Neys <neysx@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 19:54:58 +0200
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Xavier Neys wrote:
> 
>>>a) "This article is not part of the official Gentoo documentation, it
>>>has been republished on our site only for your convenience and with
>>>permisson of the respective copyright owner. It may not reflect current
>>>state of things and could be outdated."
>>
>>No need to hack the xsl for that, just add it at the beginning of each
>>article like we already have the note about owners.
> 
> This implies manual changing of several files which is not good, IMHO.

Why? We change a small number of docs once, then forget about them.
Do you think it is better to introduce more code, more complexity to be 
maintained, more stuff to be executed on each and every doc request?
Is that your definition of better?

>>Can only be done with a reliable document location made available to the
>>xsl which we lack at the moment.
>>
>>I wish we could but at the moment, we can't really
> 
> Well, I think that fixing <guide path="..."> that does'nt contain
> directory name is easier than adding some disclaimer to every file and
> could be done by a script (haven't tried, though). And it wouldn't
> matter if we didn't catch every outdated/unmaintained/... document, but
> at least some of them will be marked.

If we mark some files as unmaintained, we're also telling our users that 
non-marked files *are* maintained.

> So, is there any problem to check the value of the path attribute
> (provided it includes the directory name) against some regexp and if it
> matches, add some warning to the generated page?
> 
> Maybe also introduce another parameter to metadoc saying "this
> translation is outdated", but I'm not sure if this is worth the effort.

You should try to think about feasibility, implementation & consequences first.


/me comes back on Monday.
Have a nice weekend,
-- 
/  Xavier Neys
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project
/  French & Internationalisation Lead
\  http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en
/\


-- 
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Jan Kundrát
References:
[RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Jan Kundrát
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Xavier Neys
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Jan Kundrát
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Next by date:
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.