1.1

Il Thursday 31 January 2008 02:00:36 Robin H. Johnson ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:14:48PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > It really is best done in the tree first, so everything is correct for
> > the snapshot.  We didn't have much issue last time because we push
> > "manifest1_obsolete" into the snapshot, so digests are removed, anyway,
> > but I'd *really* prefer if this were done prior to the snapshot being
> > made.
>
> Ok, so we're just blocking on the docs guys.
>
> Are they actively working on it so I can go ahead and take the digests
> out anyway?

jkt has recently committed some fix:

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml?r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gentoo-ppc-faq.xml?r1=1.66&r2=1.67
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-working-portage.xml?r1=1.68&r2=1.69

I don't know exactly how many other docs must be changed accordingly, it's 
better to ping some GDP member to get a better feedback.

Cheers,

-- 
Davide Cendron

Gentoo Documentation Project
Italian Lead Translator

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/it/