Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml under doc or qa?
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:43:37 +0000 (UTC)

 1.1

I'm not sure if this is under doc or qa, but 

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml

could use a relatively minor but quite helpful usability tweak.

Code listing 1.1 is of course <pre>.  Line 57 (as delivered), the line 
with all those libs, ends up /very/ long for a single line.  Even at 
relatively small font sizes, it requires a window nearly 1024 px wide, 
and that's not even displaying the full ad column yet.  Of course, that 
forces the entire content to that width as well, so it's not just the 
single line at that width.  Gentoo can be commended for using "%" sized 
layout as the default, generally making page width relatively flexible, 
and normally code listings aren't long enough to be all /that/ much 
trouble (thanks to the doc team and others' hard work) but this one needs 
a little lovin', due to that one long line of code.

If the line could be split in half, so it displays on two lines, it would 
make viewing a bit easier in a narrower window.  Of course, it'll be 
split in most console windows, so splitting it for display on the page
shouldn't be a big problem.

(FWIW, I run 1600 width by default, but have my browser windows set to 
800 width by default, so I can view two windows side-by-side.  I can 
barely run 2048 width, for two by 1024 px windows, but the text gets 
blurry and the monitors only run 60 Hz at that, so it's not ideal.  One 
of these days I'll upgrade again, but until then, content columns that 
exceed 800 px are irritating.)

Or is a bug a better way to go at this?  I don't know how doc team works.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml under doc or qa?
-- Sven Vermeulen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
proposal: insert KDE Upgrade FAQ in doc index
Next by thread:
Re: proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml under doc or qa?
Previous by date:
Re: proposal: insert KDE Upgrade FAQ in doc index
Next by date:
Re: proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml under doc or qa?


May 29, 2008

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.