Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: svn vs cvs
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:22:07 -0400
On Thursday 15 September 2005 05:06 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:28 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some
> > point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around.  Of
> > course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain.  I'd love to see our gentoo
> > tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of
> > course you folks are the major users of that tree.  Has this been
> > considered?  This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be
> > feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.
>
> The tree is ~250MB at this time.  Both genkernel and catalyst are under
> this tree, and I'm sure that we don't want to move either of these any
> time soon.

i think this thread was more about gentoo/xml/ ... but gentoo/src/ is 
certainly candidate for moving to svn as soon as project leads feel it's 
appropriate
-mike
-- 
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list


References:
svn vs cvs
-- Grant Goodyear
Re: svn vs cvs
-- Chris Gianelloni
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: svn vs cvs
Next by thread:
Re: svn vs cvs
Previous by date:
Re: svn vs cvs
Next by date:
Re: svn vs cvs


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.