1 |
On Thursday 15 September 2005 05:06 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:28 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
3 |
> > One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some |
4 |
> > point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of |
5 |
> > course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo |
6 |
> > tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of |
7 |
> > course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been |
8 |
> > considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be |
9 |
> > feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The tree is ~250MB at this time. Both genkernel and catalyst are under |
12 |
> this tree, and I'm sure that we don't want to move either of these any |
13 |
> time soon. |
14 |
|
15 |
i think this thread was more about gentoo/xml/ ... but gentoo/src/ is |
16 |
certainly candidate for moving to svn as soon as project leads feel it's |
17 |
appropriate |
18 |
-mike |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |