Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Chema Alonso <nimiux@g.o>
Subject: Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:41:46 +0200
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 06:22:34PM -0700, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:39:41 +0200
> Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote:
> 
> > > 2. Translation project leads and "official" language status. Any
> > > comments as to the changes here?
> > 
> > Sure. I wanted to make it a bit less formal without lowering the
> > requirements. Now, the document sais that a language should be
> > backed up by a translation team where at least one member (the
> > translation project lead) has commit access. If this isn't the
> > case, then it is an "unsupported" language where the documents are
> > still published, but not linked.
> 
> Fine with me; I assume the translators are okay with this, too.
> 

Ok with this. The draft looks fine to me.

Thanks!

> > > 3. Join-up process. No formal "X number of contributions per
> > > period Y." Works well enough for me, but then "how much does this
> > > potential recruit actually do for us" becomes subjective
> > > hand-waving. We would need a new metric to determine commitment
> > > over time. Ideas?
> > 
> > I'm not sure we need one. Imo, the GDP project lead decides when
> > phase 2 starts (and as such when a mentor is assigned). From then
> > onwards, it is the mentor who is in charge of defining when the
> > recruitment can be started.
> > 
> > If we need a more objective metric to start with, I'd rather do it
> > on timeframe ("... sufficient document changes over a term of at
> > least 4 months"), which holds twice then (first and second phase).
> > 
> > After all, developers that have been less or inactive for some time
> > are slated to be retired anyhow, either fully (from the Gentoo
> > project) or from the GDP (removal of the GDP page and perhaps
> > cvsdoc commit rights).
> 
> This makes sense.
> 
> Alright, commit the thing. I like it.


Attachment:
pgpRMYtrsOFiT.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
References:
Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Matt Turner
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Matt Turner
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Joshua Saddler
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Joshua Saddler
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Next by thread:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Previous by date:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Next by date:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy


Updated Apr 08, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.