Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] Stage3 better than stage1/2
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:06:17
Message-Id: 1102082777.12205.13.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-doc] Stage3 better than stage1/2 by Kurt Lieber
1 On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 13:39 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote:
2 > > What this means is if we have something wrong with a stage1 tarball
3 > > that:
4 > >
5 > > #1. rac should talk to releng rather than posting contrary information
6 >
7 > To be fair, when you and I talked in #gentoo-installer a few weeks ago
8 > about dumping stage tarballs, I told you that rac had some concerns about
9 > this and that you should talk to him about it.
10
11 You're right. I had forgotten about that conversation. I know that rac
12 has had concerns with the stages for a while now. I'll contact him.
13
14 > > #2. we should work to resolve any problems with the stage1 tarball
15 >
16 > I don't think anyone disagrees with this. I think rac's solution is more
17 > of a band-aid than anything. I think he along with everyone else would
18 > like to see a better, more robust solution put in place. In the mean time,
19 > however, I don't think it hurts to notify our users of the problems with
20 > stage 1 tarballs, *in their current form*, and suggest a work-around while
21 > we work to fix them for a future version.
22
23 I agree with you there. I also think that if we're going to do things
24 like this, that it should be coordinated and put out in a much more
25 official manner. I know a bunch of users read the forums, but I also
26 know that many people don't consider information there to be
27 authoritative in any way. Perhaps a better solution would be to make
28 mention in the Handbook, then point out the change on the forums (and
29 mailing lists, etc) rather than posting contrary information. The only
30 concern that I have is the appearance of a well-respected developer
31 essentially contradicting the handbook instructions in a
32 less-than-official fashion. Instead, it should be met head-on and
33 rectified officially. Think of it more like how kids will pit parents
34 against each other. We're the "parents" here and it always works better
35 when we present a unified decision, even when we don't necessarily agree
36 on something.
37
38 Now, should we change the recommendation in the handbook?
39
40 Honestly, I do not think so. At the same time, I think we should
41 mention the caveats to using a stage1 tarball, and list the alternative.
42
43 --
44 Chris Gianelloni
45 Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager
46 Games - Developer
47 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature