Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Subject: Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:35:08 -0500

 1.1

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 21:38 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:09:33 -0500 Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@g.o>
> wrote:
> | I've performed stage1 and stage3 installs on both x86 and ppc hardware
> | and have never encountered a circular dependency problem.
> | Theoretically, such problems should never arise because of the great
> | work performed by the RelEng QA people.
> 
> No no no. Releng don't control the main tree.

ciaranm is completely correct here...  releng has no control over the
tree.  The only thing that we maintain is our own tools, and a few
packages which belong to the LiveCD herd.  While we do quite a bit of
testing to ensure things work smoothly, we have to file bugs and poke
other developers to get things fixed, just like anybody else would.

> FWIW, there's at least one combination of USE flags that'll give you a
> circularly broken bootstrap currently.

This is also true.  This is the one case rac was referring to when he
commented about circular dependency problems.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
References:
Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Nick Dimiduk
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Next by thread:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Previous by date:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Next by date:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2


May 29, 2008

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.