1 |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:19:58AM -0500, wireless wrote: |
2 |
> This issue is even simpler than that. Just assume the authors (owners?) |
3 |
> are not going to say anything. If one or 2 do, resolve the issue |
4 |
> individually, or pull the doc. After all, when was the last time |
5 |
> there was an issue of this sort? |
6 |
|
7 |
Sadly "law & regulations" don't work this way... or perhaps good that it |
8 |
doesn't work this way. Depends on your point-of-view. |
9 |
|
10 |
Anyway, from the looks of it, I guess the version attribute is generally |
11 |
accepted so we can at least start with that. Eventual follow-up actions can |
12 |
then be checked later if the need arises. |
13 |
|
14 |
Wkr, |
15 |
Sven Vermeulen |