1 |
Arun Raghavan wrote: |
2 |
> On 4/17/06, Jose Luis Rivero (YosWinK) <yoswink@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>Shyam Mani wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>>Arun Raghavan wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>[snip] |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>>Yeah, Yoswink IIRC had a similar plan quite sometime back. Yoswink, |
11 |
>>>would you please share the ideas/details? I'll try digging up IRC logs |
12 |
>>>as well to see if I can come up with anything. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>>( sorry about the delay, I was on holidays :D ) |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>>Nah, the main idea was behind improving integration between docs and |
18 |
>>ebuilds by replacing "einfo" doc related lines with an own "e-function" |
19 |
>>for gdp info. Not sure if this could help in anyway but sure isn't the |
20 |
>>solution. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I like the mock-up -- it's what I meant. Basically, what I was saying |
24 |
> is something like this: if the ebuild has a particular variable |
25 |
> (RELATED_DOC, say) defined, the notification message like yours would |
26 |
> be displayed. I tried to see if I could hack this up, but I couldn't |
27 |
> figure out where I could plug it in. I think the change is rather |
28 |
> trivial. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
I wrote "edoc" function to be used inside ebuilds (same way as einfo, |
32 |
ewarn, ...) when I made the mock-up. If you want to use it, feel free to |
33 |
pick up the patch [1] and apply it to /sbin/functions.sh. I just rewrite |
34 |
the patch few moments ago and it hasn't been tested but shouldn't eat |
35 |
any of your files :) |
36 |
|
37 |
The rest of your idea about "particular variable" need to hack emerge, |
38 |
which is something I really want to avoid. |
39 |
|
40 |
Wkr, |
41 |
|
42 |
------------------------------------------------ |
43 |
José Luis Rivero <yoswink @ gentoo .org> |
44 |
Gentoo Doc / Gentoo Alpha |
45 |
|
46 |
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~yoswink/tmp/edoc-funtions.sh.patch |
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |