List Archive: gentoo-doc
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:01:04PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Xavier Neys wrote:
> > Of course, users reading a 2004.3 handbook should realise it's old, but they
> > could at least be told it's not maintained anymore so that 1) they can read it
> > with a grain of salt 2) they should not bother submitting bugs.
> IMHO that's against what SwifT said about fixing?
No, because we have an updated handbook (namely the 2005.3/current one).
Unlike with articles of which we don't have an updated one, any bugreports
against outdated handbooks can be marked as WORKSFORME/INVALID because it is
fixed in the more recent ones.
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org
Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp
Gentoo Council Member
The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>