Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:06:23 +0200
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:01:04PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Xavier Neys wrote:
> > Of course, users reading a 2004.3 handbook should realise it's old, but they
> > could at least be told it's not maintained anymore so that 1) they can read it
> > with a grain of salt 2) they should not bother submitting bugs.
> 
> IMHO that's against what SwifT said about fixing?

No, because we have an updated handbook (namely the 2005.3/current one). 
Unlike with articles of which we don't have an updated one, any bugreports
against outdated handbooks can be marked as WORKSFORME/INVALID because it is
fixed in the more recent ones.

Wkr,
      Sven Vermeulen

-- 
  Gentoo Foundation Trustee          |  http://foundation.gentoo.org
  Gentoo Documentation Project Lead  |  http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp
  Gentoo Council Member  

  The Gentoo Project   <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>
Attachment:
pgp7aIMGQaqp7.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
[RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Jan Kundrát
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Xavier Neys
Re: Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
-- Jan Kundrát
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Previous by date:
Re: svn vs cvs
Next by date:
Role change within the German translations team


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.