Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:58:59
Message-Id: 20050917115816.GD11751@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs by Grant Goodyear
1 On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:28:58PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
2 > One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some
3 > point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of
4 > course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo
5 > tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of
6 > course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been
7 > considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be
8 > feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.
9
10 I wouldn't mind to move over to SVN personally. Just Another Versioning
11 Tool. But I do hope that SVN (don't know it really) supports:
12
13 - Running a tool right before the check-in is made permanent (in this case,
14 check for GuideXML syntax, but in future might be expanded)
15 - Annotate function
16
17 Just don't ask us to migrate to ClearCase...
18
19 Wkr,
20 Sven Vermeulen
21
22 --
23 Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org
24 Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp
25 Gentoo Council Member
26
27 The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o>