Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Subject: Re: svn vs cvs
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:06:04 -0400
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:28 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some
> point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around.  Of
> course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain.  I'd love to see our gentoo
> tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of
> course you folks are the major users of that tree.  Has this been
> considered?  This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be
> feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.

The tree is ~250MB at this time.  Both genkernel and catalyst are under
this tree, and I'm sure that we don't want to move either of these any
time soon.

Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
Re: svn vs cvs
-- Mike Frysinger
svn vs cvs
-- Grant Goodyear
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
svn vs cvs
Next by thread:
Re: svn vs cvs
Previous by date:
svn vs cvs
Next by date:
Re: svn vs cvs

Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.