Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Arun Raghavan <arunisgod@...>
Subject: Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:55:32 +0530
On 11/10/05, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote:
<snip>
> Look at bug #88777 as an example.  Look at bug #39318 of another.
<snip>
> > Please re-read the entire thread and swift's blog for reasons we're going to
> > deprecate stage1/2 installation.

Hmm .. my bad for not fully understanding the issue at hand. Thanks
for the links.
--
Arun Raghavan
(http://nemesis.accosted.net)
v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$OFck2ma4+9u8w3+1!m?l7+9GSCKi056
e6+9i4b8/9HTAen4+5g4/8APa2Xs8r1/2p5-8 hackerkey.com

-- 
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list


References:
Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
-- Arun Raghavan
Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
-- Jan Kundrát
Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
-- Chris Gianelloni
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
Next by thread:
Re: Stage1/2 deprecation from Gentoo Handbook
Previous by date:
Re: flexible license tag ?
Next by date:
Re: Departure of Broeman and Aaby


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.