| 1 |
Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> If we would mark documents as "outdated"/"unmaintained" and you'll get a |
| 3 |
> bugreport about those, what would you do differently from bugreports on |
| 4 |
> documents that are up-to-date/maintained? I would be quite surprised if you |
| 5 |
> handled those bugs differently. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well, my aim was to prevent bugreports for docs that are "no longer |
| 8 |
maintained" like articles and old Handbooks (but I got a bit confused |
| 9 |
and probably thought that old HBs contain all sections without new |
| 10 |
bugfixes which is not true). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
However, I think that we can make add some warning/disclaimer to the |
| 13 |
republished articles. And an easy way to allow Lead Translator to make |
| 14 |
some document marked as "obsolete" would be worth too, IMHO. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-jkt |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives