| 1 |
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 18:30 +0100, Xavier Neys wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thomas Raschbacher (Gentoo) wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:41 +0100, Goran Mekić wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>> So, I'd like to hear what you think. Should we have a wiki? Why or why |
| 5 |
> >> If you try to simplify things (suppose there's no spam, no obuse), |
| 6 |
> >> wiki could be a great pool of potetial official documentation. As I |
| 7 |
> >> see it, this is the greates value of wiki. "Just" pick good articles, |
| 8 |
> >> refine them and move them to official docs. As a person who never |
| 9 |
> >> administrated wiki, I have no clue how to secure it. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > How practical/possible is it to add some kind of 'verified by a |
| 12 |
> > developer / moderator' flag / tag which cannot be changed by normal |
| 13 |
> > users and only applies to a specific version of the page? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Simply impossible. |
| 16 |
> Sure you can have some 'officially sanctioned' tag on articles, but how do you |
| 17 |
> garantee it keeps this status. |
| 18 |
> Anytime anything changes in the article (easy to detect) or anywhere else in |
| 19 |
> GentooLand and the content can become very wrong. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Let users "vote" on articles, comment on them, provide feedback, and obviously |
| 22 |
> edit content... Let the wiki live its wiki life. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Wkr, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Well basically you'd have to lock the pages which are really important |
| 27 |
or just really well written with a link to another page aobut discussing |
| 28 |
it (someone else mentioned that in another mail on this thread) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Also i have to point out that the 'vote' approach would have the same |
| 31 |
problems if it just votes on the article nto a specific revision of |
| 32 |
it .. ;) |
Archives