1 |
hi |
2 |
|
3 |
i like the idea even though i'm not part of the doc team .. i'm on the |
4 |
list for some reason but that fine ;) |
5 |
|
6 |
maybe we could get some help from gentoo-wiki people and/or 'merge'.. |
7 |
|
8 |
just my 2c (i don't know previous discussions or anything btw so if this |
9 |
was mentioned before just ignore me ;)) |
10 |
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 01:16 -0800, Josh Saddler wrote: |
11 |
> Hey again. So there's some discussion (again) on starting up an official |
12 |
> Gentoo wiki. Official meaning it's hosted on our infrastructure; e.g. |
13 |
> wiki.gentoo.org. This time the discussion is coming from our fellow |
14 |
> developers and infra overlords. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I know that the GDP discussed this any number of times on this list, and |
17 |
> some of us (most notably myself and neysx) have discussed it on the |
18 |
> forums, with occasional feedback from other developers. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> However, it's been quite awhile since the last time we (the GDP) talked |
21 |
> it over. Given our current issues of manpower and time (see |
22 |
> archives.gentoo.org for commit totals), perhaps a wiki could solve some |
23 |
> issues? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The classic problems are: |
26 |
> 1) Who has access |
27 |
> 2) Who reports faulty articles |
28 |
> 3) Who fixes them |
29 |
> 4) Who verifies the article is correct |
30 |
> 5) ??? |
31 |
> 6) Profit |
32 |
> |
33 |
> So, I'd like to hear what you think. Should we have a wiki? Why or why |
34 |
> not? If so, for once, does anyone have some *sane* ways to admin and |
35 |
> moderate such a wiki? |
36 |
> |
37 |
> There's no question that having a properly-administered wiki can be a |
38 |
> powerful asset. Look at Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, the Xfce wiki, etc. What |
39 |
> about Gentoo? |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Halcyon has brought it up again on https://bugs.gentoo.org/75855, but |
42 |
> BEFORE I/we go over there and weigh in, let's hash it out here on our |
43 |
> list. :) |