Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Subject: svn vs cvs
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:28:58 -0500
Hi, all.

One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some
point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around.  Of
course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain.  I'd love to see our gentoo
tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of
course you folks are the major users of that tree.  Has this been
considered?  This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be
feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.

Thanks,
g2boojum
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@g.o
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
Attachment:
pgpk6LbxNFtS0.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: svn vs cvs
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: svn vs cvs
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: svn vs cvs
-- Chris Gianelloni
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
account assistance
Next by thread:
Re: svn vs cvs
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Next by date:
Re: svn vs cvs


Updated Oct 31, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.