Mike Frysinger wrote:

Funny, I received the ML one hours later after the personal one.


> On Sunday 03 September 2006 08:30, Xavier Neys wrote:
>> vapier wrote:
>>> vapier      06/09/03 05:02:44
>>>
>>>   Added:                handbook-ia64.xml hb-install-ia64-bootloader.xml
>>>                         hb-install-ia64-disk.xml
>>> hb-install-ia64-kernel.xml hb-install-ia64-medium.xml
>>>   Log:
>>>   initial import of ia64 handbook
>> The docs about IA64 (and arm) are much appreciated, but are we supposed mop
>> up after the files have been dumped in /doc/en/handbook?
>> I put arm between parenthesis because I am aware of a lost email about it.
>> Why do we now have IA64 arch-specific files?
>> Have those 2 new handbooks been omitted from the handbook index.xml and
>> metadoc on purpose because they are not ready yet or were we supposed to
>> discover them by accident and index them?
> 
> i sent an e-mail about both handbooks but it looks like both fucking things 
> have been dropped on the floor

Yeah, looks like it's occurring more and more often :(
If i didn't know better, I'd say our mail is handled on the same box as
bugzilla :)

> i'm not expecting anyone else to do work for me; i wasnt going to add them to 
> the handbook index until i got feedback and people are happy with them
> -mike

Nice. Thanks.
If you need help to get rid of the 4 ARCH-specific files, you know where to ask.
Any bitching about the hb*x86+amd64*xml file names will be ignored :)


Wkr,
-- 
/  Xavier Neys
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project
/
/\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/