1 |
On 11/29/11 08:01, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I don't consider this as a "problem" per se, so I don't think we need to put |
4 |
> much effort in these things. Licenses evolve; documents too. Eventually, |
5 |
> old(er) documents will be replaced with newer ones anyhow. And it is not |
6 |
> that the 2.5 license has a major issue for us - it's just that 3.0 is |
7 |
> somewhat newer and used on the wiki. |
8 |
|
9 |
This issue is even simpler than that. Just assume the authors (owners?) |
10 |
are not going to say anything. If one or 2 do, resolve the issue |
11 |
individually, or pull the doc. After all, when was the last time |
12 |
there was an issue of this sort? |
13 |
|
14 |
jmo, |
15 |
James |