1 |
Josh Saddler wrote: |
2 |
> Anyway, that's my plan -- I've a few lists of TODOs for stuff, |
3 |
> especially for the networkless docs, that will be fairly intensive. Now, |
4 |
> from the translators point of view, what do you and don't you want to |
5 |
> see me do to the docs in draft/? |
6 |
|
7 |
I'd start with copying current 2006.1 stuff into draft (be sure to |
8 |
include CVS revision in the commit message as we don't use better SCM |
9 |
that would keep track of that), then applying any changes that are |
10 |
required without any revbumps *and* without mixing content and |
11 |
formatting changes. Each commit should either touch the real content |
12 |
(and nothing else) or just change formatting, fix typos etc. It's a real |
13 |
PITA to go through a diff for a paragraph just to see someone fixed |
14 |
spelling in one word or (even worse) just re-wrapped text. |
15 |
|
16 |
As an alternative, point me to a working diff implementation that |
17 |
ignores XML formatting and just shows the real changes :). |
18 |
|
19 |
<insert usual warning about yoswink's knife here /> |
20 |
|
21 |
Cheers, |
22 |
-jkt |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |