Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
Subject: Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:39:41 +0200
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:22:37PM -0700, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> Thanks for the draft! From a quick run-through of the patch (much
> obliged for that, thanks), it seems pretty good.
> 
> The major differences to the original doc are:
> 
> 1. Doing away with the Strategic/Operational lead split. We haven't
> had two people doing those jobs in 5 years, anyway.

Yup, most - if not all - other projects are based on a project lead and lots
of minions, so this was a fairly obvious change imo.

> 2. Translation project leads and "official" language status. Any
> comments as to the changes here?

Sure. I wanted to make it a bit less formal without lowering the
requirements. Now, the document sais that a language should be backed up by
a translation team where at least one member (the translation project lead)
has commit access. If this isn't the case, then it is an "unsupported" language
where the documents are still published, but not linked.

> 3. Join-up process. No formal "X number of contributions per period
> Y." Works well enough for me, but then "how much does this potential
> recruit actually do for us" becomes subjective hand-waving. We would
> need a new metric to determine commitment over time. Ideas?

I'm not sure we need one. Imo, the GDP project lead decides when phase 2
starts (and as such when a mentor is assigned). From then onwards, it is the
mentor who is in charge of defining when the recruitment can be started.

If we need a more objective metric to start with, I'd rather do it on
timeframe ("... sufficient document changes over a term of at least 4
months"), which holds twice then (first and second phase).

After all, developers that have been less or inactive for some time are
slated to be retired anyhow, either fully (from the Gentoo project) or from
the GDP (removal of the GDP page and perhaps cvsdoc commit rights).

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen


Replies:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Joshua Saddler
References:
Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Matt Turner
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Matt Turner
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
-- Joshua Saddler
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Next by thread:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Previous by date:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy
Next by date:
Re: Review of Documentation Policy


Updated Apr 08, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.