1 |
Alexey Chumakov wrote: |
2 |
> After some extensive work with mostly outdated Russian docs, I tend to |
3 |
> agree with Jan--we need some means to signal an outdated translation. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> My proposition is somewhat simpler -- |
6 |
> |
7 |
> 1. Let the reader decide if the document is outdated :-) |
8 |
> We'll need to link the derived document to source one, and add a |
9 |
> displayed message: |
10 |
> "Source document is available at [link] |
11 |
> [optional version - fetched from source doc if possible |
12 |
> [optional date]" |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Attr might look like this: |
15 |
> <guide link="/doc/ru/sample.xml" lang="ru" source-link="/doc/en/sample.xml"> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Or, maybe it'll be possible to fetch dependency info from metadoc... |
18 |
|
19 |
Well, I asked about something similar (maybe completely different - I |
20 |
don't know XSLT much) - use <uri link="metadoc:file-id"> and |
21 |
automatically select translated file if available. I was told that it is |
22 |
not easy and (iirc) can't be done ATM. Would be great, though :-). |
23 |
|
24 |
> 2. It's also useful to introduce some link like "send comments here..." |
25 |
> directly into document, and point it to GDP [internalization] page in |
26 |
> the document's language. |
27 |
> E.g. many Russian readers do not realize easily where to post their bug |
28 |
> reports and suggestions... |
29 |
|
30 |
IMHO useless, but I'm not typical Russian reader :-) |
31 |
|
32 |
> 3. For unofficial languages, IMHO there is no need to do anything if |
33 |
> there's no index reference to it. |
34 |
|
35 |
Well, but what if previously supported language transformes into |
36 |
unsupported one? There will be some links from non-official websites |
37 |
pointing to the outdated translations... |
38 |
|
39 |
> And 3rd party articles are already marked :-) |
40 |
|
41 |
IIRC, articles themselves are *not* marked, only the index is. |
42 |
|
43 |
Cheers, |
44 |
-jkt |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |