| 1 |
Douglas Anderson wrote: |
| 2 |
> But there should be plenty of ways to go html > pdf |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
We don't want to provide a PDF just "so that we have a PDF", so printing |
| 5 |
a web page to PDF is not really an option. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If you want to improve your XSLT-FO skills, feel free to write the |
| 8 |
stylesheets; if you manage to use only the technologies that are already |
| 9 |
available on our web nodes (nope, we won't open HTML in OpenOffice, |
| 10 |
thank you), we can give it a try. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
But there's no point in generating "a PDF" without all fancy features |
| 13 |
like a book-like layout, inter-document links etc. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Why do you *need* the PDF at all? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers, |
| 18 |
-jkt |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives