Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-doc@g.o
From: wireless <wireless@...>
Subject: Re: A new lead
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:46:47 -0400
Previously you wrote:

> So maybe we should really think about migrating to wiki format. It will
> be much easier to communicate about pages, as the chatting is on the
> page itself, and editing is really no brainer.


I'm not part of the doc team. I write docs for myself, often
while I do the work. The above prose, has been proposed
numerous times, only to be shot down.

Seriously, separate wikis, one for the the
approve 'inner circle' and a separate wiki for us commoners,
would be keen and result in an  explosion of useful
information. After all, isn't this what we have, except the
inner (doc) circle has no influence over the unofficial wiki?

After some time, the inner circle could find a way  to
publish(convert) from either wiki to the form desired by the
inner circle (handbook?)....?

GIT is the future, so, when it is forced on me, sure, I'll
use it..... or just when something I really want, requires
me to read and learn about GIT in some detail......

James


Replies:
Re: A new lead
-- Michael A. Smith
References:
A new lead
-- Joshua Saddler
Re: A new lead
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: A new lead
-- Kfir Lavi
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: A new lead
Next by thread:
Re: A new lead
Previous by date:
Re: A new lead
Next by date:
Re: A new lead


Updated Mar 27, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.