| 1 |
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 16:14 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 4 |
> > В Втр, 11/11/2008 в 17:08 +0000, Duncan пишет: |
| 5 |
> >> Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> posted 491988F5.9010206@g.o, |
| 6 |
> >> excerpted below, on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:30:29 +0100: |
| 7 |
> >>> Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 8 |
> >>>> Nope. The gentoo-wiki.com owner has already stated on the forums that |
| 9 |
> >>>> he doesn't see a need for it to be hosted on our infrastructure. |
| 10 |
> >>> Did he do that after the recent debacle? I think he would be more |
| 11 |
> >>> interested now. (Yes, people can change their mind...) |
| 12 |
> >> I'm wondering on that too. Events sometimes have a way of changing |
| 13 |
> >> someone's mind, and if that could happen, I'd think it would have at this. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > This was after. I've tried to contact him too and afaik there was an |
| 16 |
> > official proposal at the same time with similar results. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> And why was that not made public? This is the first I hear about that. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I've spoken to the infra team about hosting. We're not up for jumping |
| 23 |
through loops and hoops just to get the project hosted. Mike (thrasher7) |
| 24 |
agree's on keeping the wiki 'a community' project. By hosting with the |
| 25 |
infra team, that just means we have to follow their guidelines. ie. code |
| 26 |
audits, reporting to other devs, lack of physical access to machines as |
| 27 |
well as root access, etc. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
The gentoo-portage code would be a nice addition as an official site. |
| 30 |
The current packages.gentoo.org site, as we can all agree; is nothing |
| 31 |
compared to g-p.com. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Jeremy McSpadden |
| 35 |
jeremy@×××××××××××.com |
| 36 |
Gentoo-Wiki/Portage |
| 37 |
Systems Administrator |
Archives