| 1 |
Seeing how many users are weeping for gentoo-wiki.com's content (its |
| 2 |
database was lost) I'm sure that gentoo must have own wiki. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
В Втр, 11/11/2008 в 01:16 -0800, Josh Saddler пишет: |
| 5 |
> it's been quite awhile since the last time we (the GDP) talked |
| 6 |
> it over. Given our current issues of manpower and time (see |
| 7 |
> archives.gentoo.org for commit totals), perhaps a wiki could solve some |
| 8 |
> issues? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think wiki should never be associated with GDP project. It's a |
| 11 |
separate entity - it's primary goal is to provide a single place where |
| 12 |
our users could share solutions for their problems. Yes it may help GDP |
| 13 |
project - users and/or developers could write initial proposal there and |
| 14 |
when document will be considered good GDP will convert it to guidexml |
| 15 |
and publish it. But until document is on wiki GDP has no responsibility |
| 16 |
for content published there. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> The classic problems are: |
| 19 |
> 1) Who has access |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Everybody. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> 2) Who reports faulty articles |
| 24 |
> 3) Who fixes them |
| 25 |
> 4) Who verifies the article is correct |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
It's wiki: if article faulty and user wishes to improve he/she fixes it. |
| 28 |
Mods are required to help to solve technical conflicts between users and |
| 29 |
to remove spam. Also they could help to organize content... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Peter. |
Archives