| 1 |
Goran Mekić wrote: |
| 2 |
>> So, I'd like to hear what you think. Should we have a wiki? Why or why |
| 3 |
> If you try to simplify things (suppose there's no spam, no obuse), |
| 4 |
> wiki could be a great pool of potetial official documentation. As I |
| 5 |
> see it, this is the greates value of wiki. "Just" pick good articles, |
| 6 |
> refine them and move them to official docs. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
. . . no. There's zero point in doing all the work twice (original |
| 9 |
article and then XMLifying it.) Especially since now you have twice the |
| 10 |
maintenance burden, and it IS harder to maintain XML docs than wiki |
| 11 |
articles. |
Archives