Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-doc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@g.o>
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
Subject: Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:38:00 +0000
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:09:33 -0500 Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@g.o>
wrote:
| I've performed stage1 and stage3 installs on both x86 and ppc hardware
| and have never encountered a circular dependency problem.
| Theoretically, such problems should never arise because of the great
| work performed by the RelEng QA people.

No no no. Releng don't control the main tree.

FWIW, there's at least one combination of USE flags that'll give you a
circularly broken bootstrap currently.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachment:
pgpVFCz2EhBIl.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Wendall Cada
References:
Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
-- Nick Dimiduk
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-doc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Next by thread:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Previous by date:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2
Next by date:
Re: Stage3 better than stage1/2


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-doc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.