Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: Alexander Gabert <pappy@g.o>, gentoo-embedded@g.o, gentoo-hardened@g.o, uclibc@××××××.org, etoh@××××××.com
Subject: [gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:44:04
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0312100936370.2515-100000@lnx.bridge.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status by Ned Ludd
On 9 Dec 2003, Ned Ludd wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:43, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Alexander Gabert wrote: > > > > > hi Peter, > > > > > > would you be able to submit your finale patches for the uclibc you > > > modified? > > > > You could wait a little, the pie patches could go into 0.9.24 (if Erik > > will do it), else take the patches I have sent to the uclibc list > > yesterday as tar.bz2 (not the separated ones sent earlier). The flipturn > > patch from gentoo is mostly included into uClibc cvs, the remaining part > > is attached. > > I am enforcing NOELFRELOCS like behaviour in uClibc (I have it in > > PaX/grsec too like this), this could not be conformant to what you want > > to do. Really tested is the config with CTOR_DTOR enabled, the disabled > > version works on "Hello world" as ET_DYN, no other tests done. > > > > > I would love to include it in the Gentoo uclibc to make it able to be > > > used with our unique propolice implementation! > > The propolice implementation is what you've done with move-to-glibc, not > > the new ssp_x86 (waiting further more for an answer on the file you've > > sent me ;-( ) > > > > I have also sent all my specs/patches (not really sorted) for reference to > > solar (3.5MB compressed), he will probably put them online, all were > > tested with ET_DYN/propolice. > > I mirrored your work to this location some time ago. > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/rpm_specs/ > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/gcc-etdyn-3.3.x.specs.diff
Haven't you got the new ones (with patches too)? Peter
> > > > > > Thanks very much in advance, > > > > > > Alexander > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:23, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > Sorry for cross-posting, > > > > > > > > I have rebuilt a full system (x86) with uClibc and hardened-gcc > > > > (ET_DYN/PIE and stack-protection 3.3.2-5) binaries and booted into it > > > > (kernel built with -fstack-protector). Only the packages with assembler > > > > code have problems with ET_DYN/PIE, grub has problems with > > > > stack-protection. > > > > > > > > Peter > > > >
-- Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m@×××.net> ID: 0xA5F059F2 NIC: IXUYHSKQLI Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 ____________________________________________________________________ Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol. Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu -- gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies