Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: Alexander Gabert <pappy@g.o>, gentoo-embedded@g.o, gentoo-hardened@g.o, uclibc@××××××.org, etoh@××××××.com
Subject: [gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:44:04
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0312100936370.2515-100000@lnx.bridge.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-embedded] Re: [gentoo-hardened] uClibc-0.9.23/bardened-gcc-3.3.2 status by Ned Ludd
1 On 9 Dec 2003, Ned Ludd wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:43, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
4 > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Alexander Gabert wrote:
5 > >
6 > > > hi Peter,
7 > > >
8 > > > would you be able to submit your finale patches for the uclibc you
9 > > > modified?
10 > >
11 > > You could wait a little, the pie patches could go into 0.9.24 (if Erik
12 > > will do it), else take the patches I have sent to the uclibc list
13 > > yesterday as tar.bz2 (not the separated ones sent earlier). The flipturn
14 > > patch from gentoo is mostly included into uClibc cvs, the remaining part
15 > > is attached.
16 > > I am enforcing NOELFRELOCS like behaviour in uClibc (I have it in
17 > > PaX/grsec too like this), this could not be conformant to what you want
18 > > to do. Really tested is the config with CTOR_DTOR enabled, the disabled
19 > > version works on "Hello world" as ET_DYN, no other tests done.
20 > >
21 > > > I would love to include it in the Gentoo uclibc to make it able to be
22 > > > used with our unique propolice implementation!
23 > > The propolice implementation is what you've done with move-to-glibc, not
24 > > the new ssp_x86 (waiting further more for an answer on the file you've
25 > > sent me ;-( )
26 > >
27 > > I have also sent all my specs/patches (not really sorted) for reference to
28 > > solar (3.5MB compressed), he will probably put them online, all were
29 > > tested with ET_DYN/propolice.
30 >
31 > I mirrored your work to this location some time ago.
32 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/rpm_specs/
33 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/uclibc/gcc-etdyn-3.3.x.specs.diff
34
35 Haven't you got the new ones (with patches too)?
36
37 Peter
38
39 >
40 > >
41 > > > Thanks very much in advance,
42 > > >
43 > > > Alexander
44 > >
45 > > Peter
46 > >
47 > > >
48 > > > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:23, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
49 > > > > Hello!
50 > > > >
51 > > > > Sorry for cross-posting,
52 > > > >
53 > > > > I have rebuilt a full system (x86) with uClibc and hardened-gcc
54 > > > > (ET_DYN/PIE and stack-protection 3.3.2-5) binaries and booted into it
55 > > > > (kernel built with -fstack-protector). Only the packages with assembler
56 > > > > code have problems with ET_DYN/PIE, grub has problems with
57 > > > > stack-protection.
58 > > > >
59 > > > > Peter
60 > > >
61 >
62
63 --
64 Peter S. Mazinger <ps.m@×××.net> ID: 0xA5F059F2 NIC: IXUYHSKQLI
65 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
66
67
68 ____________________________________________________________________
69 Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol.
70 Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu
71
72 --
73 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies