Gentoo Archives: gentoo-embedded

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-embedded@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] 2 missing files from portage tree
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:25:32
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0406301209230.1997-100000@nb.bridge.intra
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-embedded] 2 missing files from portage tree by Ned Ludd
1 On 29 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 10:37, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
4 > > On 29 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote:
5 > >
6 > > > You might want to look over the uclibc build itself. looks like theres a
7 > > > few cases in which the SYS_LIBC wont be defined namely inside of the
8 > > > src_compile(), src_install() where no calls to check_main_libc() are
9 > > > made.
10 > >
11 >
12 >
13 > > Would you solve this some other way, or should we use only use uclibc (if
14 > > it is set, we are building natively, else in glibc env)?
15 >
16 > Well I'm trying to approach this with you from a glibc->uclibc
17 > conversion so that would mean that this line in the check_main_libc()
18 > wont ever be triggered.
19 > [ -f /lib/lib${MY_P}.so -a ! -f /lib/libc.so.6 ]
20
21 a direct conversion is not possible, because we have to replace the
22 include files from one to the other, (also the static libs will
23 conflict) it can be done only into another subdir (as buildroot)
24
25 Peter
26
27
28 --
29 gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-embedded] 2 missing files from portage tree Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>