1 |
On 29 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 10:37, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
4 |
> > On 29 Jun 2004, Ned Ludd wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > > You might want to look over the uclibc build itself. looks like theres a |
7 |
> > > few cases in which the SYS_LIBC wont be defined namely inside of the |
8 |
> > > src_compile(), src_install() where no calls to check_main_libc() are |
9 |
> > > made. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> > Would you solve this some other way, or should we use only use uclibc (if |
14 |
> > it is set, we are building natively, else in glibc env)? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Well I'm trying to approach this with you from a glibc->uclibc |
17 |
> conversion so that would mean that this line in the check_main_libc() |
18 |
> wont ever be triggered. |
19 |
> [ -f /lib/lib${MY_P}.so -a ! -f /lib/libc.so.6 ] |
20 |
|
21 |
a direct conversion is not possible, because we have to replace the |
22 |
include files from one to the other, (also the static libs will |
23 |
conflict) it can be done only into another subdir (as buildroot) |
24 |
|
25 |
Peter |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |