| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>as for breaking standard glibc things, i'm not sure what you mean by that ... |
| 4 |
>this stage tarball is meant to never have glibc installed in it ... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
I mean, if I hack an ebuild, so it build with uclibc, it might not work |
| 8 |
on the mailstream gentoo any more, so I should proably not post anything |
| 9 |
to the bugzilla for the main tree. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>>What about a new "arch" - x86uclibc? Sorry if you already have discussed |
| 12 |
>>this. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>solar and i have actually been pounding on this detail the last few days |
| 17 |
>-mike |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
I better read the archives... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives