| 1 |
wireless wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I'd be curious to see any discussions/links others |
| 6 |
> have related to the various options for low-latency |
| 7 |
> (kernels &) techniques, either legacy or current, |
| 8 |
> that are available/recommended for embedded |
| 9 |
> gentoo. Any other embedded linux distros |
| 10 |
> discussions/links related to low latency |
| 11 |
> are of interest too. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Any discussion of experiences |
| 15 |
> with your low-latency efforts are also of |
| 16 |
> interest to me, specific the the kernel or |
| 17 |
> otherwise. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> A treatise or technical doc (discussion) |
| 21 |
> would be keen. My googling has produced many |
| 22 |
> "low quality" urls.... out of the morass of |
| 23 |
> links.... (so I'm missing something on my |
| 24 |
> searches) |
| 25 |
> Some man pages to set the scheduler: |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
You might want to explain what you are doing, or what you are trying to achive. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
1ms-5ms latency in a user space process should be very easy to achieve on a fast machine. If you want 10s of micro-second latency your going to have tough time. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
It all depends on what your trying to do as to what the best strategy may be. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
If your writing C code see: |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
man sched_setscheduler |
| 36 |
man setpriority(int |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
check out sched.h |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
remember real_time != fast |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Karl Hiramoto http://karl.hiramoto.org/ |
Archives