| 1 |
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail |
| 6 |
> > > > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ? |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > no, i had it killed |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > > or Does an |
| 11 |
> > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ? |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > your e-mailing the new list now |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Can you please add the list back. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> no, it rarely got traffic |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while |
| 22 |
> we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It's not a matter of intentional cock blocking it's more a matter |
| 25 |
of what we (embedded) are agreeing to support. Native glibc |
| 26 |
compiles fall under the realm of normal gentoo. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> -mike |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 35 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives