| 1 |
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jakub Ladman <ladmanj@×××××.cz> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hello |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> In my embedded system,the goal is small disk usage, so up to now i have |
| 6 |
> been |
| 7 |
> using qtbz2 -t and then manualy removing documentation, man pages, header |
| 8 |
> files and static libraries. |
| 9 |
> So i will be glad if a new system will be configurable to filter it |
| 10 |
> appropriately. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Thanks |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Jakub |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
I guess that the embedded system should include /etc/make.conf and we'll use |
| 18 |
the FEATURES to know what to do. The first thing will be to support the |
| 19 |
noman noinfo nodoc features |
| 20 |
This will keep us close to the convention of Gentoo. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Dne čtvrtek 16 Prosinec 2010 18:17:48 Mike Frysinger napsal(a): |
| 24 |
> > On Thursday, December 16, 2010 10:44:20 Kfir Lavi wrote: |
| 25 |
> > > What was the aim of creating portage-utils? |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > goals: |
| 28 |
> > - small |
| 29 |
> > - fast |
| 30 |
> > - little to no dependencies |
| 31 |
> > - should require only modern C compiler & library |
| 32 |
> > - support binary packages |
| 33 |
> > - fully compatible with official Gentoo PM (i.e. portage |
| 34 |
> > - have fun |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> > basically we deem python and friends to be way too heavy for embedded |
| 37 |
> > systems where most of the time you just want to install/update binary |
| 38 |
> > packages. there is no desire at all to have portage-utils build packages |
| 39 |
> > from source. -mike |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
Archives