| 1 |
Can't it simply be cfriedt@... ? That's what the ts-7000 list is, but |
| 2 |
that's yahoo groups ;-) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I don't mind if it's stored in a database somewhere in plain text, but i |
| 5 |
just feel kindof violated when people can use some data-miner to read my |
| 6 |
endless rants about how I would love to improve the current state of all |
| 7 |
things. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
hehehe... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
~/Chris |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 15 |
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 00:36 +0200, Christopher Friedt wrote: |
| 16 |
>> Hi everyone, |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> I know that we should all be free to write eachother and whatnot, but |
| 19 |
>> for the sake of at least some net-anonymity (and certainly a decreased |
| 20 |
>> amount of spam) wouldn't it be a wise suggestion to leave out domain |
| 21 |
>> names of list members? |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Most other lists that I belong to do not post email addresses publicly. |
| 24 |
>> I don't really care for the most part, but i do happen to get some spam, |
| 25 |
>> which just .... well ... sucks. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> http://scriptstest.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-embedded-per-month.xml |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> The above site was discovered only while googling the first half of my |
| 30 |
>> username, and I doubt that anyone who writes crawl-engines for data |
| 31 |
>> mining purposes would _not_ think to replace [at] with @ when adding to |
| 32 |
>> the list of spamming targets. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Chris, That's my doing.. How would you prefer that the email addresses |
| 37 |
> be obscured? btw there are tons of other places where it's archived |
| 38 |
> plain/text.. But if you have a preferred method of obscuring then just |
| 39 |
> yell. I/we can't omit all of the domain.. So we have to use some sorta |
| 40 |
> separator. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives