| 1 |
hmm... ok... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
maybe i'll stick w/ glibc for now then |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 22:55 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: |
| 8 |
>> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:25 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Christopher Friedt wrote: |
| 10 |
>>>> I've been out of the loop for a tiny bit, so could anyone shed some |
| 11 |
>>>> light on the status of the EABI on ARM processors for me? |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Is it compatible with any version of uClibc ? |
| 14 |
>>> uClibc-0.9.29 (which isnt in portage yet) is supposed to work, but i havent |
| 15 |
>>> tested it myself |
| 16 |
>> ebuild for 0.9.29 is found here: |
| 17 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182094 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> FYI.. 0.9.29 breaks things (which is why that bug is being ignored). |
| 20 |
> I'm sure you have seen the uClibc list plenty or have become aware of |
| 21 |
> the threading problems and half complete weak alias handling. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives