| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Monday 02 August 2004 05:50 pm, Natanael Copa wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>The last package was uclibc-0.9.26-r4. After that was emerged same thing |
| 7 |
>>happened as last time. Here are the last lines: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>><<< dir /usr/include/neteconet |
| 10 |
>><<< dir /usr/include/netax25 |
| 11 |
>><<< dir /usr/include/net |
| 12 |
>><<< dir /usr/include/bits |
| 13 |
>><<< dir /usr/include/asm-generic |
| 14 |
>><<< dir /usr/include/arpa |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>by the looks of it, all of uclibc was unmerged (== portage bug) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You are so right. Why didn't I see that? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
>do you have any of the uclibc libs left over in /lib/ ? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Looks like uclibc was unmerged yes. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
nc lib # ls |
| 30 |
cpp libhistory.so.5 libncurses.so.5.4 libsandbox.so |
| 31 |
rcscripts |
| 32 |
dev-state libhistory.so.5.0 libreadline.so libz.so |
| 33 |
udev-state |
| 34 |
libcurses.so libncurses.so libreadline.so.5 libz.so.1 |
| 35 |
libhistory.so libncurses.so.5 libreadline.so.5.0 libz.so.1.2.1 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
And the tail of var/log/emerge.log says: |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
1091482030: >>> emerge (11 of 45) dev-libs/uclibc-0.9.26-r4 to / |
| 41 |
1091482030: === (11 of 45) Cleaning |
| 42 |
(dev-libs/uclibc-0.9.26-r4::/usr/portage/de |
| 43 |
v-libs/uclibc/uclibc-0.9.26-r4.ebuild) |
| 44 |
1091482031: === (11 of 45) Compiling/Merging |
| 45 |
(dev-libs/uclibc-0.9.26-r4::/usr/p |
| 46 |
ortage/dev-libs/uclibc/uclibc-0.9.26-r4.ebuild) |
| 47 |
1091482294: === (11 of 45) Post-Build Cleaning |
| 48 |
(dev-libs/uclibc-0.9.26-r4::/usr |
| 49 |
/portage/dev-libs/uclibc/uclibc-0.9.26-r4.ebuild) |
| 50 |
1091482295: >>> AUTOCLEAN: dev-libs/uclibc |
| 51 |
1091482300: === Unmerging... (dev-libs/uclibc-0.9.26-r3) |
| 52 |
1091482301: *** terminating. |
| 53 |
1091482301: *** terminating. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Now, just a guess in the wild, what would happen if the einstall process |
| 56 |
didn't install uclibc in the correct location? Wouldn't the qmerge steb |
| 57 |
install an empty uclibc and then remove the existing? |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
I guess I need a binary package to get it going again? |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-- |
| 62 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives