1 |
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:40 +0100, Andreas Zuber wrote: |
2 |
> > BAD Cross Compile support? |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I tried to cross compile several packages (gdm, gtkmm, xorg-server...).. It |
5 |
> always failed somewhere. There was also a Problem that emerge said the |
6 |
> package is masked for ~amd64, but i tried to compile packages for arm... |
7 |
|
8 |
Sounds like the method. probably intermixing ~arch ebuilds with a stable |
9 |
build host and or lucked out at one point and ran into a combo that did |
10 |
not compile for you. Tip. -O is friend. |
11 |
|
12 |
Anyway native versions of the bins for the OM can be found here |
13 |
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/embedded/openmoko/ |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
> How would you call that? Good Cross Compile support? |
17 |
|
18 |
"good" vs "bad" are quite different things. try not to confuse them. So |
19 |
yeah cross-compiles always tend to quite a bit of voodoo and often send |
20 |
people running away pulling hair out. |
21 |
|
22 |
> > I've got shy of 900 pkgs for that exact CHOST all cross compiled. |
23 |
> > Perl is about the only problem. But then perl does not really belong on |
24 |
> > a phone either.. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Maybe you now say that the packages i try to compile do not belong on a phone |
27 |
> too.. but this doesn't make it better. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I'm not a specialist in writing ebuilds or make them cross compiling aware so |
30 |
> i try another way to get gentoo on my freerunner. |
31 |
|
32 |
Good luck. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
37 |
Gentoo Linux |