1 |
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 25 March 2013 07:01, Kfir Lavi <lavi.kfir@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > Hi, |
5 |
> > I'm looking for a way to reduce glibc code size. |
6 |
> > It can be a way to make system smaller and minimize the impact |
7 |
> > of attack vectors in glibc, as in return-to-libc attack. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Lets say I'm deleting the program 'mkdir', and mkdir uses a function |
10 |
> > in glibc that non of the other parts of the system uses. |
11 |
> > Then I want to eliminate this function from glibc. This leads to smaller |
12 |
> > code and if this function is used in some attack scenario, maybe prevent |
13 |
> it. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Is there a way to do it? |
16 |
> > Can you help me think how to build a tool like this? or, integrate |
17 |
> > with existing tools. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Thanks, |
20 |
> > Kfir |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> |
23 |
> You can use -Os when you compile your packages to reduce the size of |
24 |
> the resulting ELF file. |
25 |
> As for the second part of your question, I am not sure if this is |
26 |
> possible. I haven't thought this through, but |
27 |
> assuming you know no other packages depend on the function you want to |
28 |
> remove, you will have to mess |
29 |
> with the ELF file and its plt and other section entries to remove all |
30 |
> the references of that symbol. It's likely you |
31 |
> will break the file in the end. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> Regards, |
35 |
> Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
36 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Yes you right, |
39 |
This is why I want to remove the function from the sources and compile it |
40 |
again. |
41 |
|
42 |
Kfir |