| 1 |
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 14:42 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> FYI.. 0.9.29 breaks things (which is why that bug is being ignored). |
| 4 |
> I'm sure you have seen the uClibc list plenty or have become aware of |
| 5 |
> the threading problems and half complete weak alias handling. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'm bumping into issue after issue that is supposed to be fixed in |
| 8 |
0.9.29. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'm curious how the roadmap is. Should we try to fix 0.9.29 and get an |
| 11 |
0.9.29.x into portage or should we "wait" for 0.9.30? Should we try to |
| 12 |
backport stuff to 0.9.28? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Might be I could give a hand but I don't know where I should invest my |
| 15 |
time. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Natanael Copa |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives