| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 16:49, Natanael Copa wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>>Yeah nasty bug here ;/ |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>>You can however do an emerge-webrsync (It's just slow as dirt) |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>I guess there is a bug in libresolv in uclibc |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>> |
| 22 |
>>Makes me wonder if uclibc is good enough for production firewalls etc |
| 23 |
>>when it comes to security? I am just starting to look at uclibc. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
>If your using x86:uclibc there are already some security options |
| 28 |
>available to you. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Thanks for the details, it did explain some terms I just heard about before. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
We are using grsec already and we have been talking about ssp. However, |
| 35 |
as you said yourself, it gives some overhead and one of the main reasons |
| 36 |
to use uclib has to do with size. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
My question is, will uclibc do without all this fancy stuff or does it |
| 39 |
depend on it to be useable? |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Natanael Copa |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-embedded@g.o mailing list |
Archives