| 1 |
Ed W wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> The concept seems interesting though and as you say, exactly what an |
| 5 |
> overlay should help with. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ah, yes the concept is reasonable. I would think that |
| 8 |
working with smaller distros/elinux folks, maybe |
| 9 |
those that have sprung up from LFS, would be a better fit |
| 10 |
to build momentum for this idea? Then offer it to some |
| 11 |
'more visable' place like sourceforge (whatever) to use with |
| 12 |
a wider audience. Maybe build a team of developers using the |
| 13 |
system? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
pfsense, m0n0wall, IPCop, ..... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The devs around Gentoo (particularly embedded) seem to be |
| 19 |
an autonomous lot with ideas and aspirations of their |
| 20 |
own..... indeed, I think that autonomy is what drives |
| 21 |
many groups to work as they deem best for their flock..... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> I couldn't quickly find the official pages for OSS-QM, but some googling |
| 25 |
> suggests there is a limited overlay available already here: |
| 26 |
> http://repo.or.cz/w/oss-qm-packages.git/tree/GENTOO.overlay.master |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-2010050101.pdf |
Archives